Legal Opinion

William Malat and Ethel Malat v. Robert A. Riddell, District Director of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 27, 1965No. 19286_1PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Circuit Judge.

Profit derived from sales of property held by a taxpayer, primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of his trade or business, is, under section 1221 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 1 excluded from treatment as capital gain.

^This case presents the question wheth"er real estate sold at a profit by one engaged in the business of dealing in real estate had, under the particular circumstances, been held by him as an investment or primarily for sale to customers. Upon this issue the trial court has found against the taxpayer, ruling that the profit must…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rollingwood Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Bohannon v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  2. The Municipal Bond Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  3. B. B. Margolis and Iris M. Margolis v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Malat v. RiddellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Biedenharn Realty Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. Bynum v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966
  4. The Municipal Bond Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  5. William A. Scheuber and Hildegard Scheuber v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API