Legal Opinion
Harnisher v. Apfel
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 3, 1999No. 97-CV-5883 (JS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SEYBERT, District Judge.
Plaintiff John Harnisher (“Harnisher” or “plaintiff’) brings this action pursuant to *12342 U.S.C. § 405(g). Harnisher seeks review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s final determination that he is not disabled, a decision which denied Harnisher disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act (“the Act”). Plaintiff alleges that Administrative Law Judge Sol Wieselthier (“ALJ”) failed to give proper consideration to plaintiffs treating sources and failed to support with substantial evidence his decision that plaintiff was not disabled.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Ramona PEREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Patrick Balsamo v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re BoddieUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017