Legal Opinion
Teekell v. Campbell Construction Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 9, 1964No. 10098PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLADNEY, Judge.
Melburn B. Teekell brought this suit under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, alleging he sustained a hernia in the course .and scope of his employment. The Campbell Construction Company, Inc. and its insurer, Trinity Universal Insurance Company, were named as defendants. Following a trial on the merits the trial judge rendered a judgment rejecting plaintiff’s demands, hence this appeal.
The issues which are presented to this ■court for decision are: Did the plaintiff sustain his burden of proving an accident within the course and scope of his employment? Is plaintiff disabled as a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bernard v. LOUISIANA WILD LIFE AND FISHERIES COM'NLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- Broussard v. Dumas Chevrolet CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
- Sneed v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
- Marler v. Industrial Lumber Co., IncLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
- Morgan v. Strachan Shipping Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Beasley v. Service Fdry. Div. of Avondale Ship., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- Dunn v. Glen D. Lowe Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- Smith v. Phoenix Assurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- Malbrough v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- Sanchez v. Haase Construction Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.