Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Waco v. Williams

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided October 30, 2006No. 10-06-00072-CVPublished

1DissentFelipe Reyna, Justice

According to the lead opinion, the City of Waco’s immunity from suit is not waived because the Williamses’ petition alleges only an intentional tort. Because I believe Texas law requires that a person intend to cause injury to be liable for an intentional tort and because the Williamses allege the commission of a reckless assault (which is not an intentional tort), I respectfully dissent.

When we review an order granting or denying a plea to the jurisdiction, “[w]e construe the pleadings liberally in favor of the plaintiffs and look to the pleaders’ intent.” Tex. Dep’t of Parks & Wildlife v.…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Harris County v. SykesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. WhitleyTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. LoutzenhiserTexas Supreme Court · 2004

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API