Legal Opinion
Spence v. North Carolina
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 17, 1968No. 759 MPublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Per curiam
The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments of the courts below are vacated and the cases remanded for reconsideration in the light of Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U. S. 510.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent, for reasons stated in Mr. Justice Black's dissenting opinion in Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U. S. 510, 532. Mr. Justice White dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U. S. 510, 540.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
3Cited by47 opinions
- Ronald Newsom Hasan Sharif Eddie J. McMillan and Donald Wolverton v. Steve Norris, Commissioner Michael Dutton, Warden and David HindmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- State v. SilhanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Martin McNally v. The Pulitzer Publishing Company and Ted GestCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- State v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.