Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. Fuchs
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 15, 1942No. 33,228PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
The commissioner of highways made an order (No. 14,204) determining that it was necessary to acquire an easement over certain lands and also the right of access to the highway from lands abutting thereon. Condemnation proceedings under Mason St. 1927, c. 41, were instituted by the state thereon.
The district court denied the motion of interested property owners to dismiss the proceedings. Over their objection, it appointed commissioners to act in the matter. From the order appointing the commissioners, the property owners appeal. The attorney general moves to dismiss the appeal.
The appellants…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the proceedings by the St. Paul & Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Fletcher v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Duluth Transfer Railway Co. v. Duluth Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- State, by Youngquist v. HallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Peterson v. BentleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- County of Blue Earth v. StauffenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- In Re Condemnation of Lands Owned by LuhrsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Big Horn Coal Company v. SHERIDAN-WYO. COAL COMPANYWyoming Supreme Court · 1950
- State v. Wren, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.