Legal Opinion · Dissent

King v. Mound City Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 20, 1984No. 65204Published

1DissentWelliver, Judge

I respectfully dissent. Until recently, no rule of statutory construction was more solidly entrenched in our case law than the rule requiring that we strictly construe revenue laws against the taxing authority and in favor of the taxpayer. A spate of decisions by this Court in recent years, however, have given little heed to this control*939ling principle of law in favor of a policy of allowing the taxation of anything the Director of Revenue’s conscience will allow him to tax.1 In line with this new philosophy, the majority today sanctions the Director’s decision to tax unaccounted-for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mid-America Television Co. v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. Central Cooling & Supply Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  3. City of Garland v. Garland Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Langley v. Administrative Hearing CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  5. City of Springfield v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API