Legal Opinion · Dissent

Loney v. Primerica Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 20, 1998No. A97A2156Published

1DissentSmith, Judge

I must respectfully dissent, because the plaintiff is unable to demonstrate any state of facts justifying a recovery under this count of her complaint. OCGA § 9-11-12 (c).

As the majority acknowledges, a policy obtained without the knowledge and consent of the insured is void ab initio as against public policy. OCGA § 33-24-6 (a); Wood v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co., 255 Ga. 300, 303-304 (336 SE2d 806) (1985); Time Ins. Co. v. Lamar, 195 Ga. App. 452, 453-454 (393 SE2d 734) (1990). This principle of public policy cannot be waived, nor can it be eliminated by estoppel. “Regardless of the legal theory…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Phillips v. MacDougaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  2. Wood v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  3. Talley v. MathisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  4. TIME INSURANCE COMPANY v. LámarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Talley v. MathisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API