Legal Opinion

Brown v. Haak

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1882PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Lake. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

There is no written finding of facts in this ■case, and the only question really open is whether the court erred in refusing to make such a finding. Whether the reasons assigned by the court for not finding the facts could be considered valid or not we need not determine, as it must first appear that a proper request was timely made for such .a finding. The record shows that the defendants’ attorney requested in writing such a finding, but it does not appear when this request was made, whether before or after judgment. The Rule, 87, requires the request to be made before judgment, and we…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stafford v. CrawfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Federal Audit Co. v. SawyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Goebel Brewing Co. v. MedburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API