Legal Opinion

Mai E. Gilley v. Protective Life Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 31, 1994No. 93-7102PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

The district court held that under Miss. Code Ann. § 83-9-33 (1991), an insurance company that has provided single person health insurance is obliged to pay for the medical expenses of the insured’s newborn child. Concluding that no such obligation exists, we reverse and render judgment in favor of the company.

I

Mai Gilley was an employee of the Yalobu-sha County School District, which offered its employees a group insurance plan underwritten by the Protective Life Insurance Company. In 1987, Gilley purchased “single” coverage for herself under the plan. Such a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Employers Fire Insurance v. SpeedMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Haubold v. Intermedics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. Kelly v. Pan-American Life Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1991
  4. Norris v. Home Security Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Shaw v. Republic Nat. Life Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1985

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Shaw Constructors, Cross-Appellee v. Icf Kaiser Engineers, Inc., Pcs Nitrogen Fertilizer, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. Williams v. Time Warner Operation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  3. Noris Rogers v. Pearland Indep School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  4. Mannesman Demag Corp. v. M/V Concert ExpressCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  5. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. v. an Ning Jiang MVCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API