Legal Opinion
O'NEAL v. Horne
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 1, 1980No. 2 CA-CIV 3688PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHMOND, Judge.
The question on this appeal is whether appellants had a right to accelerate payment of a promissory note. Facts most favorable to support the judgment are as follows.
Appellee in settlement of a lawsuit purchased the interests of the appellants in certain real property by executing and delivering a promissory note. In the note he promised to pay appellants $29,700 in semiannual installments of at least $1,500, including interest of eight per cent per an-num beginning March 1, 1978. Appellee was to make payment to appellants “at CONTINENTAL SERVICE CORPORATION [an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Laredo Hides Co., Inc. v. H & H Meat Products Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Neal v. NealArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Schmitt v. SappArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Kerin v. UdolfSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Balmoral Arms v. RUTKINNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barker v. AgeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Mariposa Development Co. v. StoddardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- McKinley v. Town of FredoniaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- McKinley v. Town of FredoniaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984