Reeder v. Mitchell

Opinion by

DICKSON. 0.

The parti' s will he referred to as plaintiffs and defendants, as they were designated in the -trial court, inverse to the order in which they here appear.

On the 3rd day of July, 1923. the plaintiffs recovered a judgment against the defendants for ifl .426.36. and an order and decree sustaining an attachment upon certain real estate in the city of Tulsa. It was further ordered and decreed tha,t the attached property “be sold by the sheriff of Tulsa county under the same restrictions and regulations as if the same had been levied upon by execution.” On the 21st day of…