Legal Opinion

Hill v. Paige Motor Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 30, 1926No. 17044PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

MAXEY, C.

This action was begun before a justice of the peace of Carter county, by plaintiff filing a bill of particulars to which defendant filed answer. The answer is that plaintiff, being a partnership, was doing business in violation of section 8141, C. O. S. 1921, wiilch provides that a partnership doing business under a fictitious name shall file with the clerk of the district court of the county in which it is doing business a certificate, stating the names of the partners, and publish same, as provided in said section. No reply was filed to the answer, but the cáse was tried…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. General American Oil Co. v. Wagoner Oil Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fourth National Bank of Tulsa v. CochranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  2. Crisp v. NunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API