Legal Opinion

Prudential Insurance v. Zak

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 26, 1939No. 28892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

Mayer Zak sued the Prudential Insurance Company of America on its policy of insurance on the life of his wife, Minnie Zak, for $1,000, and recovered judgment for that sum. The parties will be referred to herein as they appeared in the trial court.

The defendant contends: (1) The verdict: and judgment are contrary to, and not supported by, the evidence; and are contrary to law; and (2) that the court committed error during the trial of the case by the admission of incompetent, irrelevant, and immaterial evidence on behalf of plaintiff, and by emphasizing plaintiff’s theory of the case in its…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance Co. v. StrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Washington Nat. Ins. Co. v. BryantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City National Bank & Trust Co. v. Jackson National Life InsuranceCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. New York Life Ins. Co. v. KaplanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API