United States v. Hamid
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1DissentPryor, Chief Judge
I cannot agree that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in granting the writ of error coram nobis in this case. As this court has stated recently, the writ is an extraordinary remedy which should only be granted “under circumstances compelling such action to achieve justice.” United States v. Higdon, 496 A.2d 618, 619 (D.C.1985) (quoting United States v. Morgan, 346 U.S. 502, 511, 74 S.Ct. 247, 252, 98 *647L.Ed. 248 (1954)). These circumstances must involve errors of fact on the part of the trial court which are so fundamental so as to render the proceeding itself irregular and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Khaalis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- James Bufford Farnsworth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Thomas W. Moon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.