Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Wilentz

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided May 22, 1981No. Civ. No. 81-1585Published

1Opinion of the Court

*17MEMORANDUM

BIUNNO, District Judge.

Haynes has submitted to the Clerk an affidavit of indigency for leave to file and prosecute suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming deprivation of rights under Amendment One (meaningful access to the courts), Amendment Six (expeditious process), and Amendment Fourteen (due process and equal protection).

The proof of indigency is adequate, and an order will be entered allowing prosecution under 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

The complaint must be dismissed, however (a) for lack of .jurisdiction and (b) because it is frivolous on its face, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). The reasons…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. State v. McDermottNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
  3. Green v. JenkinsDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1978
  4. Lerner v. McDermottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  5. Laird v. AbrahamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1835

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API