Legal Opinion

Tierney v. Berg

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 1984No. 46412PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis granting plaintiffs a new trial following a jury verdict on the grounds that defendant’s affirmative converse instructions, MAI 33.-05, were erroneous in that they merely negated, in the disjunctive, facts essential to plaintiffs’ case rather than affirmatively asserting facts which would defeat plaintiffs’ claims. We agree and affirm.

In this two count medical malpractice case the plaintiffs are Jeanne Tierney, a 16 year old girl, and her parents, John and Jeanne M. Tierney. Count I of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Royal Indemnity Company v. SchneiderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Koirtyohann v. Washington Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  4. Thaller v. Skinner and Kennedy CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Shepard v. Ford Motor CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. MFA INC. v. DettlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Howard Construction Co. v. Teddy Woods Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. McKee v. WilmarthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Jone v. Coleman Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. State v. HughesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API