Legal Opinion

State v. Commissioners of Halifax

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 5, 1833PublishedCited by 5 opinions

This was an indictment against the defendants for not keeping the streets of the Town of Halifax in repair. There were three counts in the indictment.

Read the full summary

This was an indictment against the defendants for not keeping the streets of the Town of Halifax in repair. There were three counts in the indictment. It was admitted on the trial that the defendants liad expended in repairing the streets, and for other lawful ami needful purposes, all the monies which they were authorized to raise by taxation or otherwise, and that there were no funds at their command at the time laid in the indictment, and it was insisted that the defendants were not bound by the provisions of the private acts relating to the town of Halifax, to repair See., but that it was…

1Opinion of the Court

GtAston, Judge.

It has been insisted for the defendants that the Judge erred in that part of his instructions to the jury, wherein he declared that the commissioners had authority to call out the hands, and. cawunand. the personal labor of the inhabitants residing within the corporate limits of the town, for the purpose of repairing the streets. This Court has examined the various acts referred to in the case, and more particularly the act of 1786 entitled “an act for the better regulation of the town of Halifax, and extending the liberties thereof” and is of. opinion that there is no error in…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Russell v. . MonroeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. State v. Wheeler.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. State v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. State v. . BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. State v. LeeperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API