Weiland v. Byrne
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
McMILLEN, District Judge.
This complaint was filed pro se by an individual who claims damages under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1982, 1983, 1985 and 1986. The plaintiff alleges that he dam aged his automobile while he was attempting to have a minor repair made by the defendant Manning. Manning did not have the necessary equipment and allegedly sent him to a service station which is not a party defendant and which also lacked the necessary equipment. He eventually had the work done for $75.00 by nondefendants. He claims that damage was sustained while attempting…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
3Cited by15 opinions
- James H. McLellan v. Mississippi Power & Light Company, International Brotherhood of Electricalworkers, Local 605 Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Boisjoly v. Morton Thiokol, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 1988
- Ippolito v. MeiselDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Pawelek v. Paramount Studios Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- Hill v. SandsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.