Legal Opinion

City of Omaha v. Philadelphia Mortgage & Trust Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1911No. 16,297PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county; George A. Day, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtSedgwick, J.

A judgment was recovered against the city of Omaha for damages caused by falling through an opening in the *521walk along tlie property owned by this defendant. After-wards the city brought this action against the defendant to recover the amount of the same judgment, interest and costs. Upon trial in the district court for Douglas county without a jury, the court found in favor of the plaintiff and entered judgment for the amount claimed. The defendant has appealed.

It appears from the evidence, a large part of which is contained in the stipulation of facts, that 25 or 30 years ago one Peter Goos…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Irvine v. . WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. City of Lincoln v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crosswhite v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Swaim v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Andresen v. BurbankNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Melburn v. WalkerDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1968
  5. Campbell v. Brandeis Investment Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API