Legal Opinion

Tzilianos v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 5, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff allegedly sustained personal injuries when he fell while exiting a train at the 59th Street subway station. Defendant argued that the measurements of the horizontal and vertical gaps between the train and the platform did not exceed the six-inch maximum standard set forth in its internal operating rules, and thus, it was not negligent, as a matter of law. Defendant failed to establish either that compliance with its six-inch gap standard proves that it was not negligent or that it is entitled to qualified immunity

In support of its argument that it is entitled to qualified immunity,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Trimarco v. KleinNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Jackson v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Sanchez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Glover v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Daniels v. New York City Tr. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  2. Leon v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Leon v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API