Faro v. Faro

OPINION

Before BOOCHEVER, C. J., and RABI-NOWITZ, CONNOR, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ. BURKE, Justice.

This appeal arises from the custody and support provisions of a divorce decree. Appellant Gail Faro contends that the trial court abused its discretion by awarding custody of the parties’ four minor children to appellee, Robert Faro. Appellant also contests the “limited” visitation rights contained in the order, the provision that she contribute $50 per month per child for their support commencing June 1, 1978, and the denial to her of any alimony or support award.

It is well established that this…