Legal Opinion

Ketchum v. Pacific R.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri

Decided September 15, 1876PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In equity.

1Opinion of the Court

TREAT, District Judge.

The defendant railroad being in the hands of receivers appointed by this court, a number of counties filed their intervening petitions, asking for the payment of taxes assessed against the companies while in possession of the receivers, and that the same should be paid out of tiie fund in their hands. The cases were referred to a master [S. D. Thompson, Esq.], who made the following report:

“Intervening petitions of Johnson, Gascon-ade and Osage counties.

“1. As to the burden of proof. The counsel forthe respondents insists that the burden lies in the first instance upon,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pacific Railroad v. KetchumSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Pacific Railroad of Missouri v. Missouri Pacific Ry. Co. And Others. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. St. Joseph Board of Public Schools v. PattenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  4. Pacific Railroad v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1880
  5. Pacific Railroad v. Missouri Pacific Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1881

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Paul v. Pacific R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API