Legal Opinion

In re Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided June 3, 2014No. MDL No. 2542Published

1Opinion of the Court

*1362TRANSFER ORDER

MARJORIE O. RENDELL, Acting Chairman.

Before the Panel:* Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, plaintiff in one Southern District of New York action moves to centralize this litigation in that district. The litigation consists of eight actions pending in the Eastern District of California, the District of Delaware, the District of Massachusetts, and the Southern District of New York, as listed on Schedule A. Since the filing of the motion, the Panel has been notified of seventeen related actions.1 The actions in this litigation primarily involve allegations that Keurig Green Mountain,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Hyundai & Kia Fuel Economy LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013
  2. In re Park West Galleries, Inc., LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API