Retail Merchants Ass'n of Houston v. Handy Dan Hardware, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WARREN, Justice.
This case involves the constitutionality of article 9001 of the Texas Revised Civil Statutes, commonly called the Texas “Blue Law.” The Texas Supreme Court has previously held the statute facially constitu*46tional against contentions similar to those made by appellees in this case. The trial court, however, found that it was not bound by the previous decisions because the records before those courts were not fully developed. The court below held the statute unconstitutional and refused appellant’s application to permanently enjoin ap-pellees from violating the statute.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Harper v. Virginia Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Harris County, Texas v. Carmax Auto Superstores IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- State v. Malone Service Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
- Limon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
- In Re Estate of TouringCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Harris County Texas v. Carmax AutoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.