Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Hansen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1934No. 25226. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage upon real estate, and also to foreclose the right asserted by the city of Tacoma to refuse to furnish further water and light service to the premises. The defendant mortgagors defaulted. A demurrer to the city’s answer having been sustained, the city declined to plead further. Findings and conclusions were subsequently made, based upon which a decree granting the relief prayed for was entered. The city of Tacoma has appealed.

The facts necessary to be considered are these: Incorporated cities and towns of this state are authorized to construct,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Provident Institution for Savings v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Dunbar v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Girard Life Insurance v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  4. City of Atlanta v. BurtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  5. Loring v. Commissioner of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hite v. Public Utility District No. 2Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In Re Walton PlywoodDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1964
  3. Seattle Mortgage Co. v. Unknown Heirs of Daisy GrayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Moran v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API