People v. Thompson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s contention that the sentencing court erred in failing to honor its sentence agreement. Where, as here, the court expressly and specifically made its commitment to impose the minimum permissible sentence of two to four years subject to certain conditions and defendant subsequently violated one of those conditions, the court was no longer bound by the agreement but could impose a greater sentence without offering defendant an opportunity to withdraw his plea (see, People v Murello, 39 NY2d 879; People v Brooks, 154…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. VallesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. MurelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. BeverlyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. HarveyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. DodsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. BurdenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. TorrenceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. BarberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. BriggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.