Legal Opinion

People v. Ansteth

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to dismiss indictment for criminally receiving stolen goods for insufficiency of evidence before the grand jury.

1Opinion of the CourtPound, J.

The evidence before the grand jury, unexplained and uncontradicted, must be sufficient to satisfy the grand jury beyond a reasonable doubt that *357defendants received the goods knowing that they had been stolen; otherwise the indictment may be dismissed. Code Crim. Pro., §§ 258, 389.

Absolute knowledge need not be proved, and the knowledge may be inferred from the circumstances surrounding the recovery. People v. Schooley, 149 N. Y. 99.

A conviction cannot be had upon the testimony of an accomplice, unless he be corroborated.by such other evidence as tends to connect the defendant with the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. . MayhewNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. People v. . SchooleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. People v. JosephsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. KupperschmidtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API