Legal Opinion · Dissent

McReynolds v. Municipal Court of the City of Ottumwa

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 23, 1973No. 55528Published

1DissentReynoldson, Justice

The majority decision acknowledges our basic rule for construction of forfeiture., statutes, applied in State v. One (1) Certain 1969 Ford Van, 191 N.W.2d 662, 666 (Iowa 1971) :

“ [I]t is penal in its nature and must be strictly construed. Nothing can be read into it that is not plainly there.”

Even more recently, in State v. Kaufman, Iowa, 201 N.W.2d 722, 723 (Iowa 1972) we said, “[Forfeitures are not favored and forfeiture statutes should be strictly construed.”

But the majority invokes the exception to the above rule, that statutes are not to be construed so strictly as to defeat the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. McBoyle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Smith v. City of Fort DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  3. In Re Estate of HaydenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  4. Rich v. FinleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  5. State v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API