Magnin v. Dinsmore
The Superior Court of New York City
Appeal by defendant from judgment and order denying motion for new trial. The facts appear fully in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.—Freedman, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiffs, who compose the firm of Y. Gr. Magnin, Gruédin & Co., against the defendant, as president of the Adams Express Company, to recover the value of a package intrusted to said company for transportation to Memphis, Tenn., and alleged not to have been delivered.
The case has been tried three times. It was twice before the court of appeals, and we are now called upon to review the questions which arose on the third trial.
On the first trial, on which the plaintiffs had a verdict for the full value of the goods, which consisted of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lamb v. Camden & Amboy Railroad & Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Ward v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Sturgess v. . BissellNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Richards v. WestcottThe Superior Court of New York City · 1858
- Magnin v. DinsmoreThe Superior Court of New York City · 1873
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Magnin v. DinsmoreThe Superior Court of New York City · 1876