Legal Opinion

Ramautar v. Wainfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 5, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for lack of informed consent, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), dated May 4, 1999, which granted the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the cause of action asserted on behalf of the plaintiff Ruby Ramautar against the defendant Michael Wainfeld to recover damages for alleged battery. Upon a review of the factual allegations of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Turcotte v. FellNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Spinosa v. WeinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Rigie v. GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McCarthy v. Mario Enters., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API