In re N.D.

TERRY, Senior Judge:

Appellant K.D. brings this appeal from the trial court’s decision to revoke her protective supervision of her daughter N.D.1 She presents two claims of error. First, appellant contends that there was insufficient evidence to permit the trial court to find that she had violated the order granting protective supervision. Second, she maintains that she was denied due process of law because the Corporation Counsel2 was allowed to make an oral motion to revoke protective supervision instead of being required to file a written motion. We find no error, and accordingly we affirm…