Legal Opinion
Ho v. Comm'r
United States Tax Court
Decided March 14, 2006No. 1291-05LUnpublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT HO, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Ho v. Comm'r
No. 1291-05L
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 2006-41; 2006 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 41; 91 T.C.M. (CCH) 876;
March 14, 2006, Filed
Robert Ho, pro se.
Elaine T. Fuller, for respondent.
Armen, Robert N.
Robert N. Armen
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This collection review case is before the Court on respondent's Motion For Summary Judgment, as supplemented, and petitioner's Motion For Leave To File Second Amended Petition. 1 As explained in detail below, we shall grant respondent's motion, as supplemented, and…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Goza v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
- Sego v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
- Sundstrand Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Sundstrand Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Moline v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2009
- Lindberg v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2010
- Stockton v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2009
- Williamson v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2009
- Constantine v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.