Legal Opinion · Dissent

Comyn v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1991No. 2012 C.D. 1989Published

1DissentSilvestri, Senior Judge

Frances Comyn (Comyn), pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. No. 237.1, entered a default judgment against the City of Philadelphia (City). The City filed a document bearing the title/label “Defendant’s Motion To Open Plaintiff’s Default Judgment.” The trial court denied City’s motion and it filed this appeal. The majority reversed the trial court without directions.1 I disagree. I would reverse the trial court and strike the judgment; hence this dissent.

On November 18, 1988, Comyn filed a civil action against Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) and the City, naming them as…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. BALK v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. McCoy v. Public Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. In Re the Upset Sale of Properties Against Which Delinquent 1981 Taxes Were Returned to the Tax Claim Unit on or About the First Monday of May, 1982Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Shainline v. Alberti Builders, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Romberger v. RombergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API