Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Painter

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 3, 1909No. 16,118PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Morris district court; Oscar L. Moore, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*575The opinion of the court was delivered by

JOHNSTON, C. J.:

A j udgment for money was recovered against D. H, Painter and Bettie C. Painter in 1893, on which executions were issued from time to time and returned unsatisfied. D. H. Painter died in 1904, and on December 2, 1907, a motion to revive the judgment as to Bettie C. Painter was made and denied. It was admitted that the judgment had never been revived against the estate of D. Hi. Painter, and it is contended here, as it was in the district court, that the failure to revive the judgment as against the administratrix of the estate of D. H.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Palmer v. StacySupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. Ohio & M. Ry. Co. v. Press Pub. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1891
  3. Ballinger v. James F. Redhead & Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1895
  4. Ray v. BrennerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  5. Read v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of DahnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  2. Davis v. MimeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Achorn v. ParkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Allen v. PattersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  5. Winter v. DunlapSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API