Legal Opinion

Citizens Finance Company of Amite v. Buchanan

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 1, 1972No. 51576PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TATE, Justice.

The plaintiff finance company sues for the unpaid balance of a promissory note evidencing a loan to the defendant, Charles Buchanan. Buchanan defends on the ground that the finance company negligently failed to obtain disability insurance, which would have paid the note when he became disabled.

The trial and intermediate courts rejected this defense. 248 So.2d 72 (La.App.1st Cir.1971). They did so because the plaintiff finance company had taken out the disability insurance on the defendant’s mother (Jessye), an endorser or accommodation maker of the note, instead of on the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bordelon v. Herculean Risks, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Arceneaux v. BellardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Maggio v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Kline v. Globe Automobile Finance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Citizens Finance Co. of Amite v. BuchananLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bonner v. Bank of CoushattaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  3. GULFCO FINANCE CO. v. KingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  4. Frank v. UNITED COMPANIES MORTGAGE & INVEST., INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Kinder Mortgage Co. v. CelestineLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API