Legal Opinion

Kansas Loan & Investment Co. v. Hutto

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1892PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Kingman District Court. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion. Judgment for defendants, Hutto and another, at the April term, 1889. The plaintiff Company brings the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Green, C.:

The Kansas Loan & Investment Company brought an action against the defendants in error to recover damages for the removal of a house from the land, upon which it claimed to have a mortgage. The defendants answered by a general denial, and also set up a counterclaim, in which they alleged that they had been damaged by the bringing of the suit; that they had been prevented from obtaining a loan of $800 upon the premises upon which the house in question had been placed; that the mortgage company through which they had negotiated a loan refused to make the same when it was…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gurske v. KelpinNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Argonia Oil & Gas Co. v. WassonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  3. First National Bank v. HasieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  4. Page v. TryonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API