United States v. Doe
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
HINCKS, Chief Judge.
In view of the situation which arose at the hearing of December 3, 1951, on this and associated cases which were continued for further hearing, it occurs to me that it may be helpful for me to state my notion of the principles that should control the judge in the discharge of his responsibility with respect to the required rulings.
First, as to John Doe which is the name I use to designate a defendant whose case is pending on a plea of not guilty. The recommendation of a dismissal of the entire case against John Doe was made, I assume, under Rule 48(a) of the Federal Rules…
2Cited by28 opinions
- In Re United States of America, United States of America v. Ray Cowan and Jack Jacobsen, Wayne O. Woodruff, Special ProsecutorsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Robert Louis Ammidown, United States of America v. Robert L. AmmidownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- In RE LEROY RICHARDS, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Arthur Peter DzialakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Myers v. FrazierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.