Legal Opinion

Scarlett v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1889PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Washington county. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Mitchell, J.:

The plaintiff in error was convicted at the Spring term of the Circuit Court, in the year 1888, for obtaining money under false pretences, and the cause comes here upon writ of error from the order of the Circuit Court overruling the motion for new trial and arrest of judgment.

Several errors are assigned and insisted upon, but we confine ourselves to the discussion of only one of them: That the indictmeüt is insufficient.

The indictment is under, section 42 of McClellan’s Di*718gest, page 864, as follows: “ Whoever designedly, by a false pretence, or by a privy or false token, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dillingham v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1855
  2. State v. EversSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  3. Johnson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Youngker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  2. Martin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Paulk v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. Benefield v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  5. Biederman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API