Legal Opinion · Dissent

Varela v. Fisher Roofing Co., Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1998No. S-96-1069Published

1DissentStephan, J.

I respectfully dissent. The trial judge made a specific finding that while unloading roofing supplies on a wet roof, Varela responded to verbal “mocking” by coworkers by challenging one of them to an arm-wrestling contest and that his injury occurred “in preparation or during the arm-wrestling contest.” Based on these findings, I regard the determination that Varela’s injury occurred as a result of conduct arising out of his employment to be clearly erroneous.

Whether an accident arose “out of” and “in the course of” employment, as those terms are used in the workers’ compensation law, must be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cords v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Welke v. City of AinsworthNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Cox v. Fagen Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Simon v. Standard Oil Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Tompkins v. RainesNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API