Legal Opinion

Clair v. City of Utica

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1972PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam R. Roy, J.

This is -a motion commenced by Richard Clair, seeking an order pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law, granting him leave to serve a proposed notice of claim after the expiration of the statutory period set forth in subdivision 1 of section 50-e. Subdivision 1, in substance, states that a notice of claim is required as a condition precedent to the commencement of an action against a public corporation; and further provides that the notice shall be given within 90 days after the claim arises.

Subdivision 5 allows this court, in its discretion, to grant leave to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. . AhearnNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. Pascucci v. County of NassauNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Claim of Jones v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peterson v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API