Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Greenbrier v. Cotton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 12, 1987No. 87-72Published

1DissentDavid Newbern, Justice

The majority opinion notes that Mr. Cotton’s legal theory was one of implied contract, but it does not make a distinction between contract implied in law and contract implied in fact. In my view this matter was submitted to the jury on a theory of contract implied in law or quasi contract. Mr. Cotton’s claim is that the city accepted his services with knowledge that they were being provided by him and he should be compensated, not for some salary figure which might have been the subject of an ordinance, but for the value of his services.

It is said that the case of City of El Dorado v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Texarkana v. FriedellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  2. City of El Dorado v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API