Legal Opinion

Dairyland Insurance Co. v. East

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1992No. 21171PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORKMAN, Justice:

This case arises upon the following two certified questions from the Circuit Court of Mercer County:

1. Whether the named insured exclusion endorsement in the Dairyland Insurance Company policy is valid and enforceable?

2. If the named insured exclusion endorsement is valid and enforceable, does the vehicle in which the named insured was riding as a passenger become an uninsured motor vehicle for purposes of recovering damages under the uninsured motorist coverage section of the policy?

In the declaratory judgment action initiated below by Dairyland Insurance Company…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Halpin v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. Deel v. SweeneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Jones v. Motorists Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. ColeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Alexander v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Tennant v. SmallwoodWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Pierce v. Oklahoma Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Blake v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurance v. AcordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. McCormick v. Allstate InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API