Orange County v. Lust
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
602 So.2d 568 (1992)
ORANGE COUNTY, Florida, etc., Petitioner,
v.
Mark LUST, Respondent.
No. 90-696.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
May 8, 1992.
Rehearing Denied August 7, 1992.
Harry A. Stewart, County Atty., and Paul Chipok, Asst. County Atty., Orlando, for petitioner.
Kelvin L. Averbuch, Orlando, for respondent.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
GRIFFIN, Judge.
A majority of this court has voted to grant respondent's motion to consider this case en banc. Having done so, we adhere to our decision to grant the writ and quash the order under review; however, we withdraw our opinion…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Dauksch; Concurrence · Sharp; Concurrence · Harris; Concurrence · Sharp.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- De Groot v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- City of Deerfield Beach v. VaillantSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Key Haven Associated Enterprises, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Internal Imp. Trust FundSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Albrecht v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Educ. Dev. Ctr., Inc. v. City of West Palm Beach Zoning Bd. of AppealsSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Metropolitan Dade County v. BlumenthalDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Maturo v. City of Coral GablesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- City of Hialeah Gardens v. MIAMI-DADE FOUNDATION, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- City of Dania v. Florida Power & LightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Dorian v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.