Legal Opinion

Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Dixon

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 7, 1982No. 21018PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AKIN, Justice.

Associated Indemnity Corporation, a worker’s compensation carrier, appeals from a judgment based upon a jury finding Mark Dixon totally and permanently incapacitated as a result of an occupational disease incurred while a meat unitizer for Kroger supermarkets. We reverse and remand on the ground that two prejudicial and inadmissible letters from Dixon’s attorney were admitted into evidence.

Associated contends that the trial judge erred in admitting into evidence the medical files of two doctors, Dr. Jewel Daughety and Dr. Bruce Faust. Associated specifically complains of a copy…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cooper Petroleum Co. v. LaGloria Oil and Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Texas General Indemnity Co. v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Hanson Southwest Corp. v. Dal-Mac Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Moore v. GranthamTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Slaughter v. Abilene State SchoolTexas Supreme Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hooper v. Torres, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1990
  2. McInnes v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API