Burback v. Goldschmidt
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.
This suit was brought by a Portland police officer who was suspended from duty for failure to comply with Rule 2.108 ① of the Manual of Rules and Pro cedures of the Portland Police Bureau. Rule 2.108 defines the minimum standards for personal appearance of both male and female uniformed personnel and, under the rule, plaintiff was ordered to shorten his hair, mustache and sideburns. Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s decree which denied his prayer for an injunction against enforcement of the rule and ancillary relief.
Plaintiff contends that Rule 2.108 is invalid on two grounds. First,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Olff v. East Side Union High School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Neuhaus v. FedericoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Greenwald v. FrankNew York Supreme Court · 1972
- Cox v. McNamaraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- Akridge v. BarresNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
3Cited by5 opinions
- Millsap v. Cedar Rapids Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- Board of Selectmen v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Marshall v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
- Brookes v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Stearns v. Metropolitan Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975