Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Larsen

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1911No. 3,025PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from, District Court, Powell County; Geo. B. Winston, Judge. Action by Anna C. Hansen and another against Johannes Larsen and others to determine the relative rights of the parties to the use of the water of Powell creek. From the decree establishing the rights of defendants Kohrs & Bielenberg, the defendant corporation Conley & MeTague Company, appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

This suit was brought to have determined the relative rights of the parties to the use of the waters of Peterson creek in Powell county. The trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law and rendered and entered a decree. From that decree, in so far as it establishes the rights of the defendants Kohrs & Bielenberg, the defendant Conley & MeTague Company, a corporation, appeals.

The record presents only the judgment-roll, and the appeal challenges but one finding of fact (No. 11), one conclusion of law (No. 27), and the decree in so far as it follows conclusion No. 27. By finding No.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bordeaux v. BordeauxMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Jacob v. LorenzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Haggin v. SaileMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Yellowstone National Bank v. GagnonMontana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Slater Brick Co. v. ShackletonMontana Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Holmstrom Land Co. v. Meagher County Newlan Creek Water DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Lokowich v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Edwards v. MuriMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  4. In Re the Application for Change of Appropriation Water Rights Nos. 101960-41S & 101967-41SMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Thrasher v. Mannix & WilsonMontana Supreme Court · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API