Legal Opinion

Moore v. Fidelity Trust Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 1, 1905No. 35PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

DALEAS, Circuit Judge.

The bill of complaint, which the court below dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, was brought by Albert H. Moore, a citizen of New York, who is a son of Andrew M. Moore, deceased, and a distributee under his will, against the three executors named therein, citizens of Pennsylvania, to whom letter's testamentary had been duly granted. One of these executors, Joseph F. Sinnott, was in partnership with Andrew M. Moore down to the time of his death, in the wholesale liquor business. The bill alleged that among the partnership assets of this firm of Moore & Sinnott were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Byers v. McAuleySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Appeal of the Odd Fellows Savings BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. Price's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
  4. Van Dyke's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  5. Leland v. NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Jorgensen v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. v. FalcianiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  3. Hotel Suburban System, Inc. v. HoldermanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. Sanitary Vendors, Inc. v. ByrneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  5. Ross v. RossNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API