Legal Opinion

People v. Farr

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 1967No. Crim. 11927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaus, P. J.

Defendant killed his wife Marcile with a target pistol in the early hours of July 5, 1965. He pleaded “not guilty. ’’ There was no plea of “not guilty by reason of insanity.” After a jury trial in which he was represented by private counsel he was found guilty of murder in the second degree.

Three issues are involved in this appeal:

1. Was the jury adequately instructed on the subject of diminished capacity ?

2. Did the evidence show, as a matter of law, that the most serious crime of which defendant was guilty is manslaughter?

3. Was a certain exhibit offered by defendant improperly excluded ?

We…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. People v. ConleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. People v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. People v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. People v. NicolausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. People v. CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. People v. MuszalskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API