People v. Farr
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKaus, P. J.
Defendant killed his wife Marcile with a target pistol in the early hours of July 5, 1965. He pleaded “not guilty. ’’ There was no plea of “not guilty by reason of insanity.” After a jury trial in which he was represented by private counsel he was found guilty of murder in the second degree.
Three issues are involved in this appeal:
1. Was the jury adequately instructed on the subject of diminished capacity ?
2. Did the evidence show, as a matter of law, that the most serious crime of which defendant was guilty is manslaughter?
3. Was a certain exhibit offered by defendant improperly excluded ?
We…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- People v. ConleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. NicolausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- People v. CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- People v. MuszalskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968