Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Lamm

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 7, 1984No. 8310SC184PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Plaintiff first assigns error to the court’s holding that the defendant is entitled to a change of venue as to the Wilson and Nash County property and its order transferring and removing *252the claims relating to the Nash County and Wilson County property to those respective counties. Plaintiff contends that “because some of the real property plaintiff seeks to recover is in fact located in Wake County, then venue is proper in Wake County as to all of the property.”

Venue in actions affecting title to land is governed, as both parties concede, by N.C. Gen. Stat. Sec. 1-76, which in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Terry v. TerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Ross v. RossCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Willard v. BargerNorth Carolina Business Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API